Alternative Chronologies: The Debate
Specialists on every side agree that dates in archaeology get revised: the redating of Göbekli Tepe and ‘Ubeidiya proves it. The disagreement is about how …
For each of our topics, the strongest case for the heterodox view, the strongest orthodox reply, and an honest account of where the evidence stands.
Specialists on every side agree that dates in archaeology get revised: the redating of Göbekli Tepe and ‘Ubeidiya proves it. The disagreement is about how …
Scholars on both sides agree that myths sometimes contain real history: Troy existed, and volcanic eruptions appear in legends. The disagreement is about how …
Everyone agrees that ancient monuments are astonishing. The argument is about who built them, when, and how. Mainstream archaeology holds that known cultures …
Nobody disputes that ancient people watched the sky, or that monuments such as Newgrange and Stonehenge were aligned to the solstices. The real disagreement is …
Few scientists today would deny that catastrophes happen. An asteroid ended the age of dinosaurs, giant floods carved the American Northwest, and climate can …
Both sides agree that archaeology has, at times, rejected findings that later proved correct. The disagreement is about why: whether anomalous evidence is …
Both sides of this debate agree that the human story has been rewritten many times in recent decades. The disagreement is about how far the revisions go: …
Archaeologists and their critics agree that civilizations can disappear from memory: the Indus Valley and the cities of the Amazon prove it. The real …